Without self-criticism, there can be no progressive thought in the academy

Scholars who teach the rest of us to read Locke and Mill ‘against the grain’ decline to do the same in the case of their own heroes, says Eric Heinze

Published on
April 15, 2025
Last updated
April 15, 2025
Busts of Lenin and Stalin
Source: pialemmel/iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Claims that academics are indoctrinating their students with liberal propaganda are increasingly common in the right-wing media. John Morgan examines why such a conviction has arisen and whether there is any substance to it

21 February

Reader's comments (4)

Please define "left" and "progressive." Their meanings are not simple or obvious. Can you explain what you mean?
Spot the Hatchling!
Graff: Entirely agreed. As I write in the new book, my concern is not with what everyone who might be called 'left' or 'progressive' may think, but with various trends that have proved influential for many years among academics self-identifying broadly on the left. But certainly, like many political and ethical vocabularies, these are fluid concepts. By the same token, not all progressives who critique notions such as 'neo-liberalism' or 'capitalism' expect each other, as a preliminary matter, to supply complete and comprehensive definitions of those terms, nor would that be much easier to do.
I have no idea what this means. Nor the original, book-promoting piece.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT