Nobelist: ‘anti-science’ Greenpeace in ‘crime against humanity’

Charity’s opposition to genetically engineered ‘golden rice’ is immoral given crop’s potential to end hunger, says Sir Richard Roberts

Published on
June 27, 2023
Last updated
June 27, 2023
Jack Grove
Sir Richard J. Roberts
Read more about
Read more about: 
Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Montage of group lifting trophy with microscope to illustrate research success

THE-Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings research success survey

Are research careers meritocratic? Do universities do enough to support researchers? Is impact more important than publications? Is interdisciplinarity the key to new discoveries? Can internationalisation survive the current global tensions? We present the views of more than 400 future sector leaders

By Paul Jump
9 October

Reader's comments (1)

#1 Submitted by graff.... on June 27, 2023 - 5:30pm
This is incredibly biased. There are two SCIENTIFIC sides to this issue. But the "Nobelist" is favored. Greenspeace is trashed This is unworthy of THE

You might also like

Donald Trump grabbing Benjamin Franklin by the hair, to illustrate Trump's attacks on world-renowned science agencies and their funding.

Can anything save US science?

As the Trump administration proposes enormous cuts for the US’ world-renowned science agencies, Jack Grove looks into what is driving the attacks beyond political malice – and what, if anything, can be done to plug the huge funding gaps

By Jack Grove
12 June

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT