A new code is no weapon against excessive self-citation

In the absence of agreed definitions and rigorous enforcement, good practice will continue to depend on personal responsibility, says Ron Iphofen

Published on
June 16, 2021
Last updated
July 8, 2021
A rusty suit of armour
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

We are now so far beyond ethical behaviour that I cannot see it changing. There seems to be no comeback from engaging in dubious practices and even more relevant, no rewards for good practice. Given the ruthless and cutthroat world of academic life, I see little prospect of improvement!
It's not so much self citation as crony intra-lab promotion - where in my experience senior people insist on lab members' work being cited, like seasoning over the almost finished article. Then there's citation as cross group - I'll scratch yours - currency. Equally, if not more unethical, is who isn't cited and presuming that most citation are to promote rather than critique other's work these days. Yet all this glorious documentation lends itself to a rich data science visualisation project.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT