×
Error message
Warning: array_key_exists() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given in
the_user_mz_analytics_variables_alter() (line
1100 of
sites/default/modules/custom/the_user/the_user.module).
Coalition of publishers, scholars and funders believes that combating confusion on issue is the first step to finding a solution
Study says comments such as ‘she should be in the kitchen, not writing papers’ affect the careers of under-represented groups
World’s second-biggest publisher says proposals to accelerate switch to open access would not be sustainable for many titles
Australian authority the latest to review planned merger of Cengage and McGraw-Hill
Some academics feel incentives do not reflect that motivation for research comes from ‘the pursuit of knowledge’, says researcher
Web of Science study says articles with more than 100 authors or involving dozens of countries can artificially boost citation impact
Uta Frith says limit would force academics to focus on quality over quantity
If periodicals hit open access targets, they could avoid being blacklisted by major European research funders in 2021
Study finds that junior scholars at less prestigious universities have most to gain from co-authoring with a leading academic early in their career
Publishing giant strikes deal with Carnegie Mellon, but California dispute remains unresolved
Elsevier could sell Dutch universities a bundle of journal access rights and software, raising concerns that universities could become stuck in one publisher’s software ecosystem
Outrage over move to replace in-house publishing with ‘open and digitised access to information’
The apparent proliferation of libel challenges by scientists accused of research misconduct have led to fears that journals and others will be dissuaded from calling out wrongdoers. But is the observation accurate? And is the chilling effect reproducible? Jack Grove reports
With 30 retractions so far and counting, experts say former Swinburne scientist exemplifies the need to screen research articles
Analysis of publishing deals across Europe highlights different costs faced by country-level consortia
Complaints about journal editors’ decisions ignore the root cause of the research assessment problem: career structure, says Richard Sever
Analysis of highly prolific Plos One editors finds evidence for ‘editor-author backscratching’
First analysis of economic cost of manuscript formatting highlights need for more flexibility from publishers, say authors
New report also calls for policy to consider embargo periods
Senior co-author says he ‘forgot’ to add reference to overlapping paper
Report suggests researchers feel there is no substitute for the traditional book-length contribution to knowledge
Recent controversy over the future directions of both Stanford and Melbourne university presses have raised questions about the role of in-house publishing arms in a world of commercialisation, impact agendas, alternative facts – and ever-diminishing monograph sales. Anna McKie reports
Outgoing commissioner frustrated that countries still strike deals on a country-by-country basis
Athene Donald tells launch of institute that universities need better data on why women drop out
Open access journal will publish results from studies sometimes dismissed as ‘failures’ as well as replication attempts
There have been big declines in the proportion of humanities and social science papers published in Norwegian, conference told
Gemma Hersh acknowledges that publishing giant could do more to demonstrate its value
Oxford professor’s response to male scholar’s guide to publication considers gendered nature of research career advice
Science’s decision sparks debate about how journals should respond to concerns about reproducibility
Universities report winning more conciliatory terms on open access question in their own negotiations with publisher
Researchers should be required to pass exams accredited by professional bodies to prove they have the skills to publish, argues John Sumpter
Survey of more than 3,000 academics finds many are sceptical about scholarship they come across
An independent service to check data and algorithms is the only way to resolve the research replication crisis, say Christophe Pérignon and Christophe Hurlin
‘Publish and read’ pact leaves Elsevier as last of three big publishers yet to reach agreement with country’s negotiators
Publishing deals need to acknowledge the reality that most research is not yet gold open access, says Elsevier’s Gemma Hersh
Funders and researchers are squandering a huge opportunity to create a more just and effective system, says Jon Tennant
Resignations follow loss of access to company’s titles
eLife editor says radical shift would help readers judge the real value of research, not just where it is published
Overstating the value of an intervention could put patients at risk, say researchers
The ‘best’ scientists lack time for peer review, and academics should be rated for ‘worthy’ papers, argues Dan Shechtman
Study pinpoints ‘disconnect’ between what academics value when submitting work for publication, and what they think others value
Calls for critical thinking from their students are rarely reflected in academics’ own writing or institutional behaviour, says Alex Wright
US’ top producer of research papers hopes stance will force major gains in open access
All modern academics know that it’s publish or perish, but is regular publication a gateway or a barrier to groundbreaking scholarship? Simon Baker assesses the data on the relationship between research volume and quality and asks which, if either, should be prioritised
Recent confusion over The Lancet’s stance on green open access highlights the difficulty for support staff in preparing researchers for the new rules, says Alice Gibson
Founder of Ligo project reveals some researchers have left over a lack of recognition, exposing wider attribution difficulties for large teams
Editors say episode demonstrates need for humans to review work of software
Calculation by open access campaigners questions supposedly unnecessary spending by publishers on lobbying, marketing and executive pay
Berlin-based academic network faces court action in US and Germany, and lost more than €12 million (£10.7 million) in 2017, accounts show
Analysis of more than 120 million academic publications since the beginning of the 19th century shows more is more as academics compete for attention
‘Reviewer 2’ is blamed by many academics for much of the stress and anxiety of publication – but the fightback is under way
Shifting towards open access journals will only achieve so much when review and editing processes take so long, scientists say
Next step of Plan S will require publishers to release acceptance rates and review times
Consultation responses had called for start of mandate to be pushed back from January 2020
Asked by THE why taxpayers should not be able to immediately see the results of research they financed, Kelvin Droegemeier answered: ‘They maybe should’
Lincoln Allison may have lived through the glory days of academic publishing, but he still wonders whether the countless hours he spent writing his 14 moderately successful tomes would have been better spent on the tennis court
Repositories, publishing platforms and data annotating tools ‘also stuck behind paywalls’
Surveys reveal complex mix of concerns about misuse of research results
Holding ‘probably innocent’ co-authors responsible for research wrongdoing cannot be justified, say academics
Despite attempts to renegotiate contracts, European institutions face an annual price hike of 3.6 per cent