Don’t rely on LEO data to judge a degree’s value

Research reveals how the new Longitudinal Education Outcomes data on graduate earnings give a misleading view of graduate earnings and value for money, says Gordon McKenzie

Published on

September 28, 2018

Last updated

October 1, 2018

Gordon McKenzie

Twitter: @gordonmckenzi10

cash

Source: iStock

Read more about

Read more about:

Higher education policy

Register to continue

Why register?

Registration is free and only takes a moment
Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
Sign up for our newsletter

Subscribe

Or subscribe for unlimited access to:

Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
Digital editions
Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis

Please or to read this article.

Related articles

Water slide

LEO data reveal complex factors affecting graduate earnings

An analysis of the graduate salary data alongside prior attainment shows how difficult it is to measure university performance on such a metric

16 June

Stacked pound coins

Looking at graduate earnings by university is pointless

The value added by a university matters more than how much its graduates earn, says Bahram Bekhradnia

By Bahram Bekhradnia

23 December

Mushroom cloud

Graduate earnings figures with explosive political impact

John Morgan looks at the policy implications from long-awaited research into graduate earnings

13 April

Graduate earnings: ‘human capital’ gains subject to scrutiny

‘Manhattan Project’ that some think could pave the way for variable fees proceeds with Nuffield funding

19 December

Related universities

Sponsored