Will court settlement finally lay Richard III saga to rest?

I dson;t know why, but there is something about Richard III that seems to bring out the most ludicrous, pompous, sentemental and sententious moralisings in people and Coogan is only the latest of them. RIII was a rather nasty brutal warlord in a time of nasty brutal warlords and, personally, I never cared much where he was buried. Shakespoeare wrote a wonderful drama which, among other things, is a powerful study of the "machiavellian" ruler as the term was understood then, based on Tudor propaganda (by that dreadful torturer Thomas More). But all this subsequent starry-eyed hagiography and attempt to reclaim his allegedly sainted memory, a ludicrous and whimsical project furthered by rather dotty individuals in the main, which this film buys into is simply ridiculous. A more serious focused psychological vcase history of these people and their weird obsessions, which require a villainous establishment out to get them and ridicule them, would be very valuable in my view. The French did this a lot better than us. During the Revolution, revolutionaries broke up the royal tombs at the Basilica of Saint-Denis, removing the remains of kings and queens and dumping them into large pits with quicklime to speed their decomposition. RIII was lucky to end up under the car park!!!