What will the Covid inquiry tell us about science and politics?

Ministers’ communications with their scientific advisers have been revealed, shining a light on how such relationships work, but will wide-ranging exercise change how research informs policy in the future?

Published on
November 17, 2023
Last updated
November 17, 2023
A member of the public walks past a display of signs relating to Covid
Source: Getty Images
Hindsight: a key question that has emerged is whether scientists should have urged action or simply presented evidence

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (3)

Statistical modelling is more akin to science fiction than to science, it is described as drawing a mathematically precise line from an unwarranted assumption to a foregone conclusion.
Fascinating though it may be to future historians and ammunition for present day politicians to attack one another, this 'inquiry' is - like so many others - completely useless as they are designed to find fault with how people acted in difficult situations rather than to discern what went wrong (and what was successful) with the intent of improving processes and decision-making in the future by making it inherently harder to make the same mistakes again. To be of any value the approach of 'Fix problems, not blame' is essential.
In response to Tracey Brown's comments: clearly, the experts could and should have probed whether they were asked the 'right questions'. Simply providing technical responses without critically assessing the merits of the research question is, in my opinion, a hallmark of poor science.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT