Reform ‘wasteful’ research grant process, says UK bureaucracy review

More innovative screening of grant applications that avoid full peer review could remove red tape burden on researchers, says Adam Tickell

Published on
July 28, 2022
Last updated
July 28, 2022
Documents stacked high

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Also, the funding should be reviewed only on the merits of the research. The review does tend to get biased once the details/affiliations of the applicant/team are known. After all, that is what the end goal is, research excellence.
Would strongly endorse the recommendation to make two-stage application processes the norm to avoid wasting the time of researchers (and administrators, colleagues, and peer reviewers) getting up lengthy project proposals. I had a very positive experience with the Leverhulme Trust's two-stage process.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT