Identifying reviewers weakens peer review, study suggests

Male reviewers more than twice as likely as females to voluntarily identify themselves, and signed reviews substantially less critical of authors, analysis finds

Published on
October 27, 2021
Last updated
October 30, 2021

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Related universities

Reader's comments (1)

This study does not really show that signin a review weakens peer-review. Because signature is voluntary in Functional Ecology, it is likely that reviewers are more willing to sign reviews on manuscripts they like i.e., which they would rate highly in any case. It would be interesting to compare journals that have a truly open peer-review (reviewer identity is always disclosed) with journals always following the blind practice in the same field. This would reveal if openness always leads to less critical reviewes.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT