How decolonised is my curriculum? There’s an app for that

Imperial creates tool to analyse geographic distribution of authors on reading lists and socio-economic status of their country

Published on
May 13, 2021
Last updated
May 13, 2021
Smiling robot illustrating a digital tool that can tell academics how decolonised their curricula are
Source: Getty

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Computer says: too Eurocentric

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

The movement to ‘decolonise’ university curricula has leaped into the political and educational mainstream in the wake of George Floyd’s death, dividing opinion on campus and beyond. Anna McKie examines how scholars are handling difficult discussions and where the agenda goes next

26 November

The impact of the Black Lives Matter movement has raised urgent issues for universities about who should be taught what – and how. After 40 years of pushing to widen the range of voices taught on literature courses, Lyn Innes still sees much to be done that is crucial for students of all races

10 December

Reader's comments (8)

A somewhat meaningless metric. You can only add to your reading list things that have actually been written, so if authors in the global south/from poorer nations don't write about your subject - or indeed if authors of the appropriate heritage have gone to work in the global north - you'll appear less 'decolonised' than you actually are. It also leaves no scope for academic excellence - do you really want to select what you recommend to your students based on ethnicity or global origin? Of course not, you want them to access the best writings in your domain!
Totally agree. This was being written as I composed my comment below.
Author response - This method is not intended, and indeed cannot tell you the global output of publications in your field or the 'academic excellence' of them. There are already many bibliographic databases that provide those things. Our study has produced data indicating the geographic distribution of authors chosen for inclusion on curricula. This is of interest to some course leaders and students who otherwise have no reasonable method to access this data aggregated at a module or course level, and can use it as an evidence-based insight to encourage discussions and reflection.
In STEM, it is inevitable that most of the resources exist in the most developed countries. Ditto the discoveries of the past. Such problems may (or may not) bedevil the Arts and Humanities but the same is not true of all subjects.
This is not the first such too, as claimed in the article. https://jlsumner.shinyapps.io/syllabustool/ https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096517002074
The preprint cites the Gender Balance Assessment Tool, which performs a different analysis (name-based gender and ethnicity prediction) to that of our study (distribution of declared author country and country GNI per capita).
Not sure how it would work in somewhere like Australia which is heavily colonized but in southern hemisphere.
Thank you this is an important point. The preprint acknowledges that the data can only have meaning if interpreted within the historical and demographic context of the institution and country so it would be really interesting to apply to a reading list from an Australian institution.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT