Research student allocation must be fair and transparent

Managers must acknowledge that supervising some types of doctoral candidates is more labour-intensive, say Roger Watson and David Thompson

Published on
August 7, 2020
Last updated
August 7, 2020
A feather and a stone equally balanced
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

The relationship between PhD students and their supervisors is often said to be the most intense in the academy, with huge implications for student success. Yet most supervisors receive little if any training. Here, six academics give their take on how to approach it 

Reader's comments (1)

I find this bizare, and I guess it highlights the disciplinary differences - academics in my field - arn't allocated students - they compete for them. A PhD student is a major boost to your research productivity. International students sometimes require more supervision (althuogh not always), but they also often bring research funding with them, which is yet another boost to your productivity. This creates a dilemma for WL systems - it takes time to supervise a student. Time that could be spent teaching or doing admin, but most academics would much rather be supervising PhD students if they could get away with it.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT