Augar warns against unpicking post-18 review recommendations

After fears that government could seek to cut fees without replacement funding, review chair stresses plans are interconnected

Published on

June 12, 2019

Last updated

June 12, 2019

Twitter: @johncmorgan3

Hanging by thread

Read more about

Read more about:

Higher education policy

University funding and finances

Register to continue

Why register?

Registration is free and only takes a moment
Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
Sign up for our newsletter

Subscribe

Or subscribe for unlimited access to:

Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
Digital editions
Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis

Please or to read this article.

Related articles

Michael Arthur

Sector leaders fear arts ‘disaster’ if fee cut means funding cut

Peers hear debate about whether English universities might become more reliant on international students if fee cut recommended by Augar review is implemented without replacement funding

By Rachael Pells

4 June

Models of flying pigs

Ex-ministers warn Treasury will not make up funding if fees cut

Augar review’s call to replace lost income ‘not credible’, says Lord Willetts, while Jo Johnson warns that any such funding stream could be ‘slush fund’ for ministerial projects

6 June

Crystal ball

‘Regressive’ loan changes seen as hobbling Augar’s prospects

Political survival chances slim for report’s HE funding plans, but some issues won’t go away, senior sector figures suggest

4 June

U turn

Augar review: reversing Cameron, Osborne and Browne’s ‘past errors’

Post-18 review highlights the chaotic nature of Westminster policymaking, writes John Morgan

30 May

Sponsored