Free Speech Rankings: misleading, ill-informed and worryingly influential

The evidence used to compile Spiked Online’s Free Speech Rankings is not to be trusted, says Carl Thompson

Published on
February 17, 2018
Last updated
February 21, 2018
Free speech, censor, censorship, academic freedom of expression
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (5)

If you don't think that there is a problem with free speech on university campuses, you've either never been to one, or you have your head in the sand.
I second that Martin Wayne. Good on Spiked for alerting the less informed to the problem.
Any evidence you'd like to offer here to support this, Martin, that we could maybe debate? Or any thoughts on what is in fact the main thrust of the piece - that cancelling a student night club out of courtesy to local residents is hardly meaningful censorship or suppression of intellectual debate? And likewise with refusing to run ads from payday loan companies and many other things Spiked classify as 'censorship' - they're really not!
Further to the above, here is New Scientist's take on these scare stories: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg23731662-900-curbing-hate-speech-isnt-censorship-its-the-law/
For anyone wishing to read up on Spiked's background and current agenda, here are some useful discussions: https://spiked-watch.tumblr.com/post/169304015155/what-does-spikedonline-really-want https://spiked-watch.tumblr.com/post/167798193240/life-inside-the-rcp-cult http://wonkhe.com/blogs/were-all-special-snowflakes-now/ http://www.lobbywatch.org/lm_watch.html http://www.variant.org.uk/24texts/lmnetwork.html

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT