Antipsychiatry scholarship provokes academic freedom debate

The University of Toronto’s scholarship raises questions about the extent to which academic freedom is appropriate

Published on
February 1, 2017
Last updated
February 1, 2017
doctors administering electroshock therapy
Source: Getty
For review? there’s room for debate on topics such as electroconvulsive therapy but not on ‘whether psychiatry is invalid or not’, says Edward Shorter

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Does antipsychiatry merit a rightful place in academy?

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related universities

Reader's comments (1)

Some background to this is that Toronto is where one of the worst cases of psychiatric abuse ever took place - the "depatterning" experiments of eminent psychiatrist Ewan Cameron, a description of whose treatment sounds like something out of a horror film - including vast numbers of electroshocks, making patients listen to tapes over and over again, and forced sleep - there is a fascinating interview with one of the survivors in the first chapter of Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine". It is good to see that Toronto University are making some attempt to address this nightmare past. Your article quotes heavily Professor Shorter, who has written a book advocating the use of ECT as safe - he glosses over these events in a few short paragraphs, as he does much else. His is certainly not a neutral viewpoint.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT