Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Roots and branches

Published on
December 4, 1998
Last updated
May 27, 2015

"Ancient English selfhood" and "perpetual rootedness" - are these serious criteria for 20th-century poetry? Valentine Cunningham's advocacy of Ted Hughes over Sylvia Plath (THES, November ) resorts to fundamentalisms of nation as bad as the gender fundamentalisms he claims to challenge.

The greatness of both poets will long survive biographical point-scoring about what their daddies did or whether an English or American poet is more likely to understand European "brutalisms". Hughes had no more "blood" right to the horrors of European history than Plath. Both were "tourists at the bullfight". The experience that yields a poem is not a matter of "rootedness" but of imagination, which can happen (or not) anywhere.

Angela Leighton English department University of Hull

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT