New Zealand ‘tinkering’ with research assessment exercise

Academics bemoan softly-softly reforms to ‘fundamentally broken system’

Published on
July 2, 2021
Last updated
July 2, 2021
tinkering tweak last minute changes spanners, illustrating changes to New Zealand’s Performance-Based Research Fund
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

What a circus. PBRF has encouraged game playing on a massive scale, only benefiting a proliferation of rent-seekers in managerial and senior academic positions. It accomplishes the very opposite of what it sets out to accomplish. Really. Just make it stop already. The benefits of the system wore off long ago.
I'm reading over the PBRF 2025 guidelines right now. Unbelievable. New Zealand academia is reeling, and the TEC seriously intends to rerun this exercise with no real changes. There's a good argument that PBRF is part of why things are currently such a mess. Did the TEC even bother to examine other countries conducting similar exercises, notably reports from the REF 2021? Who is going to benefit from PBRF 2025? Not the average research-active academic under 50 years of age. Certainly not students. Perhaps a few elitist professors who'll retire immediately after, and those who wangled their way onto panels (and their cadres). And how is a flawed system going to work any better for indigenous funding than it did for anybody else?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT