Should REF environment statements get the chop?

Lengthy statements on the research environment found in university departments are increasingly under scrutiny

Published on
May 29, 2022
Last updated
May 29, 2022
Person chopping wood with axe

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Absolutely. Scraping the environment statement would be utterly disastrous. Remember the alleged issues with british gymnastics that was widely publicised in the media - results at any cost might not be in the best interests of UK HE. In fact the environment statement should be strengthened and more objective measures should be required rather than allowing instituions to waffle. Include staff surveys as a part of the environment statement or allow individual or groups of members of staff to anonymously and directly feedback to the REF panel. The REF should work for the individual researchers too not just the managers and psudeo managers who get bonuses and/or retention payments running to thousands of pounds for good performance on the REF. Make sure that game players are penalised. ets hope the review panel will be bold, radical and will actually have a spine and makes recommendations that not only advances the quality of instituions but also enriches the lives of the individual academics. We live forever in hope.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT