Peer review before research tied to better science

Registered reports model produces better outcomes on all 19 criteria covering novelty, rigour, and importance

Published on
June 24, 2021
Last updated
June 24, 2021
Brian Nosek, director of the Center for Open Science

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (1)

Great thing indeed. For all the universities spending money on useless mock REFs, your academics' lives will be much better if you implemented this Instead of marking already published material. Provide support through a panel of expert peers which can help push international excellent to world leading research where it can. In fact universities can collaborate to form cross university panels. Universities can also get experts from top universities from across the globe to go on to these panels too. Much better use of money than internal REF evaluations.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT