Journals’ statistics rules ‘help tackle reproducibility crisis’

Study outlines how publishers’ guidelines led to adoption of positive research practices

Published on

May 29, 2017

Last updated

May 30, 2017

Twitter: @HollyElse

Statistics on digital screen

Read more about

Read more about:

Academic publishing

Research ethics

Register to continue

Why register?

Registration is free and only takes a moment
Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
Sign up for our newsletter

Subscribe

Or subscribe for unlimited access to:

Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
Digital editions
Digital access to THE’s university and college rankings analysis

Please or to read this article.

Related articles

Toy cops and robber on keyboard

No heroes and villains in academic publishing

Jeffrey Beall’s blacklist of predatory publishers has disappeared, and so too should ideas about ‘good’ and ‘bad’ journals, argues Martin Parker

By Martin Parker

26 January

Man cycles along severely damaged road

New PhD students ‘facing shifting landscape on publishing’

Latest EUA doctoral council chair says open science very much on his agenda for the role

7 December

giant picture frame around view

Dutch lose access to OUP journals in subscription standoff

Negotiators fail to reach a deal with Oxford University Press over transition to open access

6 May

Crocodile, predator, predatory

Thirteen ways to spot a ‘predatory journal’ (and why we shouldn’t call them that)

Larissa Shamseer and David Moher have taken a close look at what it is that sets dodgy journals apart from the rest

By Larissa Shamseer

27 March

Related universities

Sponsored