Johnson’s mooted fees plan ‘incredibly short-sighted’

Experts say using differential fees to direct students towards subjects goes against the purpose of higher education, and is also unlikely to work

Published on
July 20, 2020
Last updated
July 20, 2020
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

Self interest rides high once again on the horse of hypocrisy. Why not be honest? Most Universities want more arts students because they are less expensive to support and teach and the funds can be used on research or to cross subsidise other courses.
If that was the case, the experts would be arguing in favour of this. As Nick Hillman says, fees don't tend to influence student choice; and a rise in fees for arts and humanities students would, if you were right, make them more appealing. Universities would drop science courses, and stock up on more lucrative arts students. But we don't live in that world; and still, after over a decade of forced marketisation, universities aren't that mercenary.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT