Imperial Covid-19 researchers criticise plans to cut 75 ICT jobs

Members of the Imperial College Covid-19 Response Team warn against redundancies in ‘vital’ jobs

Published on
June 9, 2020
Last updated
June 9, 2020
Imperial College London
Source: iStock

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Has the online transition worked out? How far are student numbers likely to decline? Will governments still have money to invest in universities and research after the pandemic is over? And what does all that mean for staffing? These are just some of the issues explored by our survey of 200 university leaders from 53 territories. Paul Jump runs through the results

25 June

Reader's comments (7)

Classic Imperial double-speak. As usual, follow the money. Which to find you have to wade through 50 (out of 60) pages of managerial hocus-pocus to find. How sacking 25% of the workforce will somehow make things so much better truly beggars belief.
Nick, no surprise there. I was made redundant from Imperial in 2006, which happened to be good for me, but as I understand that process didn't result in any savings.
Instead, pay the oligopolies huge sums of money and inculcate the dependence on the oligopolies. UKHE is morally deficient in not adopting OpenSource and introducing an alternative.
University IT departments are often run like IT departments in companies. I wish they would instead adopt an open-source philosophy and cater more to what scientists really need. That would be support for LaTeX, R, Linux, Thunderbird, mySQL etc instead of Word, SPSS, Windows, Outlook, PostgreSQL etc. They need real nerds there, not people with lots of Microsoft certificates. Would make scientists' lives so much easier. And it would save training and software costs on top of that.
Never going to happen, Uni IT needs always start with control, who can buy, what they can install, and active tracking, not just the GCHQ active interception stuff, tracking of activity on and of Uni owned machines, tracking of content moving over Uni networks on personal devices, and tracking of keystrokes, virtually every contract of employment Uni staff have signed, especially when updated versions are demanded to be signed allows all of this. Trades Union officials in some Uni's have such intrusive tracking and interception being used against them, and their members, they have to use on-line e-mail providers and VPN services just to maintain basic confidentiality, this became very clear for some with parallel e-mails taking several hours to arrive into their Uni account inboxes, due to manual reading interception, yet virtually instantly into on-line accounts and non-intercepted Uni accounts. The CCP virus has however taught us one thing, obstructive IT departments can be bypassed, machines can be wiped and reloaded, the authoritarian IT dept backlash is yet to come...
@ NJF I completely agree.
The way this restructuring is being done is wrong because management are rushing it through in breach of the College’s own official procedures on restructuring. See the open letter from UCU at https://ucu.imperial.ac.uk/. HR immediately placed all members of ICT in separate risk groups, with recruitment to new roles scheduled to start before the consultation was due to be finished. Staff skills and abilities have not even been properly assessed against their new job descriptions with the result that some good quality staff are being lost while others have been placed in high pay roles that they don't have the skills or abilities to carry out.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT