What can be done to resolve academic authorship disputes?

With careers riding on young scientists’ position in author lists, friction is all too common. A snowballing initiative to list authors’ contributions aims to make sure credit is always given where it is due. But will it be enough to ease the angst? Jack Grove is first author

Published on
January 30, 2020
Last updated
June 25, 2020
two ice hockey players in tackle
Source: Getty

POSTSCRIPT:

Print headline: Order, order

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (2)

With respect to the "first author" placement in a published scientific paper, when I had a post-graduate student under my direction working for a higher degree, a "half way house" paper for publication, or a verbal presentation at a Congress or similar, would carry the student's name as the second (or last author, if other co-workers had been involved), and as the first author when the paper(s) was/were reporting the results of the research activities which had been undertaken and successfully defended during the viva voce examination. Such a tactic established the interested party as a nascent and credible scientific author, and that person continued from there.
An analysis of the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), with discussion of some of its potential pitfalls, was published last year in the journal Publications (https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/7/2/24).

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT