Halt fraud before it hits the headlines

Universities should vet research outputs before they get to the publishing (and scandal) stage, say Roger Watson and Mark Hayter

Published on
April 4, 2013
Last updated
May 27, 2015

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

A n excellent suggestion but a change in mindset is required to make it a reality. In my experience of trying to expose bad research, covering up fraud is easier for universities than preventing it. For a third party account of my unsuccessful efforts visit www.abettermousetrap.co.uk/whistleblower-inventor-alleges-fraud-by-manchester-university
Gagging the publication of papers unless University appointed invigilators decide the article meets such ill-defined criteria as being "necessary" or "sufficiently original"… ?? Hard to imagine an idea less compatible with the purpose and values of a university. And of course while these university guardian's opaque censorship is fine, the authors think our actual intellectual peers are inadequate to judge work in their own field of expertise.... Wow!

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT