Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Letter: Logic and lesbians 3

Published on
February 15, 2002
Last updated
May 22, 2015

The stigmatisation of lesbianism is perpetuated in the dispute between Martin Pugh and June Purvis ("Lesbian fracas splits scholars", THES , January 25).

Writers who are anti-feminist or critical of one strand of feminist politics use the suggestion of lesbianism as a discrediting tactic. Some feminist historians have responded by ignoring evidence of lesbian relationships and/or emphasising the beauty and heterosexuality of suffrage leaders. A more recent strategy, which emphasises the historiographical difficulty of claiming that someone was a lesbian, serves the same purpose. There are difficulties, but when a higher standard of proof is demanded than for attributing heterosexuality, then a heterosexist double standard is operating.

Yes, some suffragettes were lesbians. Sometimes it affected their politics, sometimes it did not. To deny this is to reinforce anti-lesbian prejudice that affects all women, not only lesbians.

Judy Greenway
Department of cultural studies
University of East London

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs