Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Letter: Chutzpah and the RAE 1

Published on
March 15, 2002
Last updated
May 22, 2015

Professor Lapping's otherwise insightful analysis of citations as an index of research excellence (Laurie Taylor, THES , March 8) misses one important point - the willingness of researchers to cite their own work and no one else's that is so crucial to developing a high citation impact.

In my studies (Grymme-Reiper, 1997; 1998a; b; 2000; 2001), I have developed an index of self-citation: the Chutzpah Scale. It extends from 1 (own work never cited, usually because there isn't any) to 5* (only own work ever cited).

I am sorry to have to inform Professor Lapping that his department of cultural and media studies is stuck on 3b (mostly other people's work cited, with a few self-citations).

The good news is that there are pockets of excellence in cultural and media studies. Dr Piercemuller's publications, though few and far between, are comfortably 5* on the Chutzpah Scale (Grymme-Reiper, 2002, a-f).

Hugh Grymme-Reiper
Department of RAE studies
City University of Poppleton

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT