World University Rankings: we’re widening access to our rich database

Back in 2003, an unremarkable policy review for the UK government made a recommendation that would have implications for global higher education and research beyond anyone’s wildest expectations.

The report was the Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration, which had been commissioned by the UK Treasury to explore how the two sectors could work more effectively to boost economic growth.

Among an extensive list of technical recommendations was an almost peripheral idea that would end up changing the global sector: Lambert’s Recommendation 6.4 said that leading research universities “should encourage the development of a league table of the world’s best research-intensive universities”.

It explained: “Government policy is to finance university research in such a way as to ensure that the UK has a number of institutions able to compete with the best in the world, but it has no yardsticks against which it can measure its success... British universities are… failing to recognise that in a global marketplace what counts is how they stand up against the best in the world.”

A world ranking of research-intensive universities, Lambert said, would not only help inform government policy but would help university leaders “in their efforts to win the support of their colleagues and the Government for their strategic plans”.

Times Higher Education rose to the challenge and in November 2004, less than a year after Lambert’s recommendation, the first edition of the THE World University Rankings was published (in what was then known as the Times Higher Education Supplement).

The rest is history: the ranking has grown from 200 universities across 29 countries in 2004 to more than 2,000 institutions from 115 territories today; while the audience has expanded from a few tens of thousands of readers of a mainly print newspaper to a global, online reach in the multimillions – and a media reach calculated in the billions – during the same period.

THE’s rankings have been trusted by millions of students and their families across the years, and indeed across the generations, to provide independent, rigorous data to help them navigate one of the most important choices of their lives: who to trust with their university education.

But it is important to remember that, from their very foundations more than 20 years ago, the THE World University Rankings are here to provide data-driven, strategic insights to university strategists, leadership teams and higher education and research policymakers.

That means the rankings are driven by some core principles missing in many other, similar-looking exercises. First, they are developed “by the sector, for the sector”; we don’t rank cars or holidays or hospitals or anything else, and all our rankings have been devised in partnership with the global higher education community.

Another principle is transparency and accountability: our core audience of scholars, university administrators and policymakers is the most demanding of them all, and they subject us to the closest critical scrutiny and hold us to account for the work we do.

But the most fundamental principle is data rigour – the trusted quality of our data that helps inform leaders’ major strategic decisions.

The data behind the THE World University Rankings is truly unique.

In developing the rankings, THE created its own global data definitions to provide a harmonised and truly comparable view of global higher education not available anywhere else on the planet. We collect basic, institutional data, such as income and student and staff numbers, directly from more than 3,000 universities each year, amounting to about half a million data values across 11 broad subject areas. We receive roughly 50,000 annual responses from experts in more than 170 countries to our Academic Reputation Survey, and we gather data on research productivity and research excellence from our partners Elsevier – with 18.7 million research papers and 174.9 million citations being analysed for the 2026 edition of the World University Rankings, to be precise.

The World University Rankings takes these three core data sources – THE’s institutional data, THE’s academic reputation data, and Elsevier’s bibliometric data – and creates 18 separate performance indicators, covering all of a university’s core missions (teaching, research, knowledge transfer and internationalisation).

It is the world’s largest and most comprehensive databank of institutional information, created with THE’s unparalleled data cleaning and quality assurance systems. There is simply no resource like this anywhere else in the world.

Participation in the World University Rankings is free of charge for all institutions that volunteer to share institutional data with us. All participating universities claim their ranking position on THE’s website (and across the world’s media) and can benchmark their scores on five key performance pillars against thousands of peers.

Any website user can rank and reorder all universities by their individual scores for any of the five performance pillars, create bespoke filters by country or groups of countries, and view detailed data profiles for each institution exploring performance trends on all the pillar scores over the past decade. And all this across 11 separate subject areas. All for free.

Since 2015, we have opened up the deeper data behind the World University Rankings and offered more insights through annual subscriptions to our DataPoints platform. Hundreds of universities worldwide are using DataPoints, where they can break down the details behind the five performance pillars and access data on all 18 of the separate rankings performance metrics, benchmarking themselves against selected peer groups.

The platform, with tiered access, also allows users to analyse all of THE’s Academic Reputation Survey data to understand how they are perceived for academic excellence across different disciplines and across the world.

But we want to go further. We want to widen the benefits of THE’s exceptional data resources, allowing more universities to unlock actionable, data-driven insights.

So today, we are delighted to announce a new subscription to DataPoints – the Essential Dashboard – priced deliberately low to be accessible to all universities as an entry-level package to help them on their data benchmarking journey. The new Essential Dashboard provides:

• Performance analytics dashboard: Full access to the subscribing institution’s score breakdowns across all five pillars and 18 performance metrics, benchmarked globally and regionally
• Peer benchmarking: Full performance metrics benchmarking against two selected peer institutions – whether key competitors or aspirational benchmarks – to track trends and identify opportunities for improvement
• Insights hub: White papers, best practice guides and support documentation to help with your performance analysis
• Onboarding guides: User guides and videos to help you get the most from the platform

Subscribers will also receive exclusive early access to their World University Rankings 2027 results two weeks ahead of the official publication date in September 2026.

But most importantly, the new Essential Dashboard brings a larger and wider group of universities into THE’s DataPoints family – helping them turn rankings, and the data behind the rankings, into rich, actionable insights.

Phil Baty is chief global affairs officer at Times Higher Education.

Find out more about the WUR Essential Dashboard