Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Critics branded as unrealistic

Published on
July 21, 2000
Last updated
May 27, 2015

The co-author of the controversial report on top-up fees commissioned by the Russell Group of top research universities has hit back at critics.

David Greenaway, pro vice-chancellor at Nottingham University, who summarised the conclusions of economists on the future of higher education funding in a report published two weeks ago, said it made no sense to "sit on the fence" over funding.

He told The THES that vice-chancellors who criticised his report for presenting top-up fees as the only viable way were being unrealistic.

Mr Greenaway thought many of his report's recommendations had been misunderstood. Its proposals for the introduction of top-up fees, backed by more scholarships and bursaries and a privatised income-contingent loans scheme, need not deter students from lower income groups, he said.

The system would mean no up-front payments and students entering lower paid professions might never have to repay a penny.

The Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals plans to present its members with an interim report on "a range of funding options" at a meeting in September.

Letters, page 15

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT