Site disruption

We are doing some essential maintenance work and you will not be able to register or update your profile setting until we've finished, which should be at about 9pm this evening.

We apologise for any inconvenience - you will be able to register shortly. In the mean time you will still be able to log in as usual.

Analysis: Highs and lows for higher education under Labour

Published on
August 1, 2003
Last updated
May 22, 2015

1990-91

* Institute for Public Policy Research meetings involving several centre-left thinkers conclude that tuition fees and student loans are necessary to fund higher education expansion

1992

* IPPR pamphlet Higher Education: Expansion and Reform sets out radical ideas for tuition fees and student loans

1993

* Labour's further and higher education spokesman Jeff Rooker (right) is sacked for authoring a consultation paper saying tuition fees are necessary

1994

* Choosing to Change paper, published by the Higher Education Quality Council, advocates a voucher system for higher education

ADVERTISEMENT

* Social Justice Commission proposes a learning bank with contributions from students and employers

1995

* Labour opposition argues over "graduate tax" to fund higher education expansion

ADVERTISEMENT

1996

* Dearing inquiry begins

1997

* May - Labour government elected in electoral landslide

* July - Dearing report published and on same day the new education secretary David Blunkett reveals policy to introduce tuition fees, scrap grants and increase student loans

* November - Teaching and Higher Education bill introduced in order to change the student-loans system and to stop universities charging top-up fees 1998

* February - Universities and Colleges Admissions System figures show that the threat of tuition fees and higher debt may be deterring mature students from applying to university

* July - Teaching and Higher Education bill receives Royal Assent

* July - first comprehensive spending review gives higher education an extra £445 million over two years keeping annual cut in funding to 1 per cent. Extra 35,000 student places allocated for 1999-2000. Science gets an extra £1.4 billion over three years

* September-October - first intake of students start paying fees of up to £1,000, with no maintenance grants. Instead they take out the new larger, income-contingent loans

* December - further spending review details reveal an additional £776 million for higher education over the next two years, much of it to come from tuition fees

ADVERTISEMENT

1999

* October - prime minister Tony Blair surprises higher education by setting a 50 per cent participation target for higher education

* November - Liberal Democrats uncover a government-commissioned survey dating from February 1998, before the introduction of tuition fees, indicating that fees would deter mature students

2000

* January - student grants announced for mature students from autumn and for younger students from disadvantaged backgrounds the year after

* July - second spending review gives another £100 million to higher education (a 4.6 per cent real terms rise between 2000-01 and 2001-02) and government claims not only to have halted the year-on-year cuts but that real-terms spending per student will rise between 0.5 and 1 per cent in 2001-02

ADVERTISEMENT

2001

* February - David Blunkett rules out top-up fees for the duration of the next parliament

* June - Labour re-elected with another thumping majority

* June - Mr Blunkett moves to the Home Office. Estelle Morris becomes education secretary

* July - Labour Party national policy forum hears that student hardship was a major concern among voters during that year's general election campaign

* October - Mr Blair and chancellor Gordon Brown, rattled by the policy forum report and signs that the system introduced in 1997 may have negative effects, call for a review of higher education to be published in the new year

* December - IPPR report Opportunity for Whom? recommends higher fees, ending of subsidy on student loans, and grants for poorest students

2002

* Spring - review fails to materialise as government realises the size of the undertaking and begins to realise that the only solution may be higher fees and a graduate tax

* July - the spending review pumps another £1.25 billion into science and research

* September - higher education minister Margaret Hodge calls for radical reform to create a "freer" higher education market ending the one-size-fits-all university culture

* October - Mr Blair calls for reform of the public sector and an end to one-size-fits-all services

* October - Ms Morris resigns. Charles Clarke appointed

* October to January 2003 - Mr Clarke finalises the review that has since transmuted into a fully fledged higher education white paper. Discussions with the Treasury finally rule out a graduate tax

* November - Mr Blair and Mr Clarke hold Downing Street meeting with vice-chancellors to galvanise support for top-up fees

2003

* January - white paper published advocating fees of up to £3,000 a year, income-contingent graduate repayments and means-tested grants of up to £1,000 a year

ADVERTISEMENT

* July - education and skills select committee publishes report on the white paper calling for annual fees of up to £5,000 a year combined with grants of up to £5,000 paid for by ending the interest-rate subsidy on student loans

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT