Mega-journals: the future, a stepping stone to it or a leap into the abyss?

Nature’s new kid on the block is now the biggest journal in the world. But while such giants are currently overturning the world of scholarly publishing, their long-term future is unclear, says Stephen Pinfield

Published on
October 13, 2016
Last updated
October 17, 2016
The Giant's Causeway
Source: iStock
The Giant's Causeway

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Reader's comments (2)

Excellent post Stephen. I've included it in my related blog today - A Review of MegaJournals https://steelgraham.wordpress.com/2016/10/17/a-review-of-megajournals/
To some degree, I do not see a problem in these mega-journals. I think there should be peer review for scientific soundness as well as data duplication. There is a problem with some of the "higher-impact" journals not publishing negative data. This wastes not only resources but the time of numerous investigators. These mega-journals have the potential to solve this problem. I do think these open access journals should require publication of raw data. This will allow individuals reading the paper the opportunity to make an informed discussion as to the validity of the article. Laura http://lauraonscience.blogspot.com/

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT