Disciplinary and court hearings are no places to confront objectionable ideas

Debate risks legitimising dehumanising ideologies, but rebutting such views is how progress has always been made, says Eric Heinze

Published on
February 19, 2024
Last updated
February 19, 2024
A courtroom
Source: iStock/DenKuvaiev

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (4)

Bravo! And well said! Of course, over the last half century and more, in fact where freedom of expression has been challenged by such cases, it has become well-established that even odious ideas are protected. A fortiori in the academy where the marketplace of ideas also serves the public interest in the pursuit of science. We foreclose such freedom at our peril.
Agreed!
There is also the frequent conflation of antisemitism with anti-Zionism or opposition to the activities of the State of Israel. Some folk are deluded into thinking that they are the same, that any opinion opposed to what Israel is doing is automatically antisemitic when it is not.
"marketplace ideal": is that what it is?

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT