Athena Swan’s ‘all-embracing’ equality vision may not serve women

The article does highlight some interesting points.The charter always felt like it was simply a marketing tool. Do the bare minimum to get an award and then publicise it on the web pages. If it doesn't encompass equality for all (at all levels and irrespective of any personal characteristics) it serves no purpose. It also needs to be able to cope with a dynamic model and changing needs e.g. we have increasingly seen a trend for senior leaders to recruit and promote ex-colleagues and associates - if analysis can show this to be inequitable, isn't it just as bad as the previous preference for recruiting mostly men into senior academic roles.

The strapline here seems to be chosen purely to insight controvesy, rather than represent the content of the article, as the quote in the strap line is the only sentence about that topic in the whole piece.